You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

DanielLC comments on How should negative externalities be handled? (Warning: politics) - Less Wrong Discussion

-5 Post author: nigerweiss 08 May 2013 09:40PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (131)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanielLC 09 May 2013 11:07:07PM 0 points [-]

The most interesting question for me is what do we do if, as seems likely, automation and technological development produces an abundance of goods and leisure time.

Anything abundant, such as air, we will use freely as we do now. Anything scarce, such as front row seats to a live concert, we will either distribute using an economy as we do now, or we will distribute with central planning, because that works a lot better when you have a superintelligent AI as the planner.

Also, I'm skeptical of it it so most stuff is abundant. We will simply increase the population until it's scarce again.

If this future comes about, how should we structure our economy and society?

We can just use simple wealth redistribution. Tax everyone X%, and evenly distribute the money. I would not recommend communism unless you have a superhuman AI central planner.