You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

CellBioGuy comments on The impact of whole brain emulation - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: jkaufman 14 May 2013 07:59PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (34)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Yosarian2 15 May 2013 12:54:01AM 3 points [-]

I would think that we would probably want to have cultural, ethical, and legal rules against infinitely copying yourself. For one thing, that leads to the rather dystpoian situation Robert Hanson was talking about; and for another, it would lead to a rapidly diminishing amount of variety among humans, which would be sad. One or two copies of you might be ok, but would you really want to live in a world where there are billions of copies of you, billions of copies of Von Neumann, and almost no one else to talk to? Remember, you are now immortal, and the amount of subjective time you are going to live is going to be vast; boredom could be a huge problem, and you would want a huge variety of people to interact with and be social with, wouldn't you?

I really think that we wouldn't want to allow an large amount of copying of the exact same mind to happen.

Comment author: CellBioGuy 15 May 2013 01:14:37AM *  1 point [-]

it would lead to a rapidly diminishing amount of variety among humans, which would be sad

Not to mention dangerous. Dissensus is one of the few nearly-universally effective insurance policies.

Comment author: Wei_Dai 15 May 2013 11:39:19AM 1 point [-]

Dissensus is one of the few nearly-universally effective insurance policies.

Or possibly a good way to get everyone killed. For example suppose any sufficiently intelligent being can build a device to trigger a false vacuum catastrophe.