You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Luke_A_Somers comments on Improving Cryonics - Regulations and Ethical Considerations - Less Wrong Discussion

0 [deleted] 14 May 2013 09:54PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (16)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 15 May 2013 01:00:30AM 8 points [-]

I don't think we're close enough to a viable restoration procedure that we need to think about this too hard. When we are, we'll see what kinds of testing we need.

Comment author: [deleted] 15 May 2013 03:58:14AM *  0 points [-]

I wasn't thinking about it TOO hard, just considering whether it would be a realistic option and weighing the pros and cons.

How far along is the research on bringing people back? What I found was general information and promises of future medicine potential, etc.

The future is nice to think about - I get caught up in it myself. But I'm wondering about tackling these things before they come up, or at least having a better understanding of it. I'm not a cryonicist.

Comment author: Desrtopa 15 May 2013 10:25:21PM 0 points [-]

I'm not a cryogenicist (sp?)

Cryonicist. Cryogenics is actually the practice of producing cold temperatures rather than freezing people. It's a common point of confusion.

Comment author: [deleted] 15 May 2013 10:55:09PM 2 points [-]

... fixed.

XKCD didn't help here: http://xkcd.com/989/