You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ESRogs comments on Kevin Drum's Article about AI and Technology - Less Wrong Discussion

19 Post author: knb 15 May 2013 07:38AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (33)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ESRogs 16 May 2013 06:26:03PM 2 points [-]

Enslaving, in terms of putting to work w/o pay, doesn't make much sense in the hypothetical where the marginal value of human labor is effectively worthless, right? What would the poor be enslaved to do?

Perhaps a more realistic scary scenario would be this one: http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2009/11/dire-problem-and-virtual-option.html (essentially: when you're no longer of productive benefit to society, you go to virtual reality / video game heaven).

How scary that proposal sounds might be a matter of debate, though I suppose most folks around here would prefer a more egalitarian scenario where cognitive enhancement is distributed evenly enough that no human is left behind.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 16 May 2013 08:46:35PM 3 points [-]

For my own part, I'm content to wirehead to the extent that I have confidence that machines are capable of being more productive-to-others than I am along the axes I value being productive-to-others on.

Put differently: I don't seem to care very much whether I am doing important things, as long as important things are getting done at least as effectively as they would be were I doing them.

There's a slight refinement to this in the case where the entities doing the important things are basically like me, since there's a whole question of whether I'm defecting in a Prisoner's Dilemma, but I interpret the connotations of "machine" as implying that this complication doesn't arise here.

Comment author: ESRogs 16 May 2013 09:07:19PM 0 points [-]

Ah, a very interesting point of view. Framing it as a dichotomy between important work and wireheading seems a bit stark though. Are you meaning to include any sort non-productive fun under the umbrella of wireheading? I usually think of that term as implying only simple, non-complex fun (e.g. pleasure of orgasm vs experience of love and friendship).

Comment author: TheOtherDave 16 May 2013 10:46:15PM 3 points [-]

This gets difficult to specify, because "productive" and "important" are themselves ill-defined, but I certainly mean to include "virtual reality/video game heaven" within "wireheading," including VR environments including virtual people that pretend to love and befriend me. (This is distinguished from actual people who really do love and befriend me, whether they have flesh-and-blood bodies or not.)

That said, I have no idea, ultimately, if I would prefer the continuous-orgasm video game or the fake-love-and-friendship video game... I might well prefer the latter, or to switch back and forth, or something else.

Comment author: ESRogs 17 May 2013 05:47:59PM 0 points [-]

Ah, that clears things up, thanks!

Comment author: MugaSofer 23 May 2013 04:16:33PM 0 points [-]

Perhaps a more realistic scary scenario would be this one: http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2009/11/dire-problem-and-virtual-option.html (essentially: when you're no longer of productive benefit to society, you go to virtual reality / video game heaven).

It certainly seems more analogous to welfare or gated communities than a hypothetical "war against the poor" does.