You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

bogdanb comments on [LINK] Soylent crowdfunding - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: Qiaochu_Yuan 21 May 2013 07:09PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (169)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: bogdanb 21 May 2013 10:47:50PM *  1 point [-]

I don't think so, yet, but check this out: http://qz.com/86685/the-audacious-plan-to-end-hunger-with-3-d-printed-food/

What is this, the year of technical food!? Wasn't the first cultured "hamburger" also announced just a few days ago?

Comment author: CellBioGuy 22 May 2013 02:37:24PM 2 points [-]

In what way does the 'printing' aspect add any value to the food in terms of availability or value? It's just a way to make complicated shapes, it changes nothing about the feedstock itself.

Comment author: bogdanb 27 May 2013 06:38:39PM 0 points [-]

Well, a nice juicy steak is usually much less apetizing if you pass it through a blender first. Texture, shape and color can add value by making people happier (or at least less miserable). That should work the other way too, a nutritionally excelent but disgusting sludge might be turned into something more palatable.

Now, making funny-shaped biscuits won’t end world hunger this week, but it’s a step.

Comment author: Petruchio 22 May 2013 12:24:13PM 0 points [-]

That was "meat" cultured in a petridish. It is awhile away from being a food replacement. But you are right, this is an exciting time.