You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Petruchio comments on [LINK] Soylent crowdfunding - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: Qiaochu_Yuan 21 May 2013 07:09PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (169)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: sanddbox 21 May 2013 11:22:26PM 5 points [-]

I would strongly recommend against doing this; a meal replacement shake designed by one guy simply won't cover every possible nutrient/compound you'd need from food.

It'll be healthier and more enjoyable just to eat actual food. Our understanding of nutrition is growing, but we're not at the point where we can apply reductionism to food. Supplements are extremely effective as part of a diet, but we don't know enough to make a diet completely based upon supplements.

If you're going to go for meal replacement anyway, don't choose soylent. His understanding of nutrition is mediocre at best; as an example, he put no cholesterol at all in his original formula (I have no idea if he's updated it or not).

Comment author: Petruchio 22 May 2013 11:35:53AM 2 points [-]

Food is good, but not that good. For instance, 95% of the time, I settle for eating something unhealthy and not particularly appetizing, because it is easy and quick to make. If I were cooking for someone else, this may be a different story. When I first read the Odyssey by Homer, my professor told me the Greek behaved as though sharing a meal was a spiritual experience, which is reflected in our culture (dinner dates, family meals, holidays etc.)

But as I currently do not eat with others on a regular basis, I think it would be of greater utility to go with whole food replacement, and eat with others on rare occasions, provided the cost for food replacement is low enough. Or I can explore new post-food psycho-social opportunities, which should be interesting in of itself.

Comment author: sanddbox 23 May 2013 05:41:01AM 1 point [-]

Yes, it's better than a shit diet. Pretty much anything is better than shitty diet, though.

My point is that Soylent will be suboptimal. Also, most of the claims they make can't be substantiated.

Comment author: MugaSofer 23 May 2013 02:30:48PM -2 points [-]

Yes, it's better than a shit diet. Pretty much anything is better than shitty diet, though.

So ... what other options are you including in "anything", exactly?

Comment author: sanddbox 24 May 2013 06:02:38PM 1 point [-]

I think it goes without saying what I mean. Healthy diet > soylent > shit diet