= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
HungryHobo comments on Problems with Academia and the Rising Sea - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (39)
that's... actually a really good idea.
somehow incentivising a rule of always citing a replication of an experiment would make a massive difference.
I don't think it about incentives. It's roughly the same matter of work to cite a replication than the original experiment. It's rather about convincing the scientists that it's a hallmark of good science to cite the replication.
You start by convincing the cool people. Let them signal that they are cool by citing replications.
Afterwards you go to a journal and ask: "Do you support good science? If so, please add a rule to your paper review process that submitters have to cite first replications instead of the original paper."