You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on Open Thread, June 2-15, 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: TimS 02 June 2013 02:22AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (433)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 03 June 2013 07:59:27PM 3 points [-]

If you're solvent and people want dollars later, then they will lend you money.

I don't find that obvious. There is a whole host of issues here, starting with time constraints (e.g. you need money within 24 hours and you can get a loan in five business days) and ending with information asymmetry issues of which lenders are acutely cognizant ("you say you're solvent, but can you prove it?").

If your "access to credit" is a couple of credit cards, yeah, you can get cash fast enough but the terms are rarely what I'd call "reasonable". If you'd actually need a new loan or a line of credit... I don't think I would want to rely on that in an emergency.

Comment author: ThrustVectoring 04 June 2013 01:57:34AM *  0 points [-]

How often do you really need money within 24 hours? If you can't get the cash within a day, what bad consequences are going to happen?

If it's a purchase under $5000, then you can handle it with a credit card. You then have 21 days to come up with the money or else pay 20% APR. That's plenty of time if you have, say, stocks you can sell. For larger purchases, you can either save for it with an explicit plan, or negotiate a payment plan.

Comment author: Lumifer 04 June 2013 07:57:25PM 1 point [-]

How often do you really need money within 24 hours?

In an emergency I expect to need money right now, on the time scale of hours.

Comment author: ThrustVectoring 04 June 2013 08:06:10PM 1 point [-]

How many times have you needed money immediately in your life, and how much money have you needed for those incidents? Personally, I do not recall ever spending more than a hundred dollars without at least a day's warning. Then again, I don't own a car, which is a big cause for emergency spending - but really that ought to have it's own fund treated as self-insurance.

Comment author: Lumifer 04 June 2013 08:18:05PM 2 points [-]

How many times have you needed money immediately in your life, and how much money have you needed for those incidents?

Well, if you want to approach this properly... :-)

...then you'll need to evaluate the probability density of situations in your life where not having a certain amount of cash on hand will lead to severely negative outcomes (aka high costs). I expect that you'll have much difficulty in trying to form a reasonable estimate (see Nassim Taleb and the general Black Swan concept). Notably, limited amount of historical data (as in, e.g. your personal experience) is not all that good a basis for estimations.

There is also a whole bunch of other factors in play -- do you have kids? do you travel much? outside of the US? etc. etc.

Comment author: [deleted] 06 June 2013 06:14:41AM 0 points [-]

What sort of emergency do you have in mind?

Comment author: Lumifer 06 June 2013 02:28:34PM 1 point [-]

Example 1: medevac.

Example 2: You live up north, it's winter, and your house's heating just died. If you don't fix it by the time the house cools down to below freezing, some of your water pipes will burst.

Comment author: [deleted] 08 June 2013 04:02:18AM 0 points [-]

Maybe you could drain all your pipes in the latter case. But I imagine there are other emergencies, of course.