You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Decius comments on Open Thread, June 2-15, 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: TimS 02 June 2013 02:22AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (433)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Decius 07 June 2013 04:05:18AM 1 point [-]

Are you accepting bids in things other than currencies commonly used for exchange? I would like to offer a finely crafted narrative instead of bitcoins.

Comment author: gwern 07 June 2013 03:07:40PM 1 point [-]

Hm, is your narrative so compelling that I would accept jam tomorrow instead of bitcoin today?

Comment author: thomblake 10 June 2013 07:23:21PM 0 points [-]

Upvoted for the multilayered pun

Comment author: Decius 07 June 2013 04:53:51PM 0 points [-]

I offer no guarantees regarding the quality, completeness, or any other details of said narrative (save that it will be a narrative, delivered within 90 days of acceptance of terms, with payment in full due immediately on receipt), although I will accept your input, if you want me to, on length, theme, setting, genre and/or other details.

As for the relative value of narratives and btc, I can say only that I have not written for any commonly recognized currency.

Accepting this offer would subject you to a considerable amount of downside risk, as well as a considerable amount of upside risk. However, people who auction their soul are not typically averse to these types of risk.

Comment author: gwern 07 June 2013 05:21:37PM 2 points [-]

Mm, I'm afraid that due to the hyperinflation over the past few decades of narrative and subsequent debasement (>3.2m on FanFiction.net alone), I can't accept any amount of it without guarantees of its quality. Nothing personal - it's the law.

Comment author: Decius 07 June 2013 05:26:14PM 0 points [-]

What would you accept as sufficient evidence of quality?

Comment author: [deleted] 07 June 2013 05:31:34PM 3 points [-]

A Hugo Award, I presume. </snark>

Comment author: gwern 07 June 2013 05:37:04PM 3 points [-]

Or a Nebula, Locus, or World Fantasy Award. I'd also accept a Nobel or Man Booker (for magical realism).

Comment author: Decius 07 June 2013 11:34:57PM 0 points [-]

Which one do you want? I can have a crack team of ninja liberate it from the current owner and deliver it to you, but that will cost significantly more than your soul.

Comment author: gwern 08 June 2013 02:24:22AM 1 point [-]

but that will cost significantly more than your soul.

Well then, I'm afraid we would be unable to reach a mutually beneficial agreement - I would be better off retaining my soul under such a sale.

Comment author: Decius 08 June 2013 02:35:27AM 1 point [-]

You could also earn or steal your own frikkin' literature award.

The typical narrative written by a winner of a high-prestige award is worth significantly more than a few btc in straight commercial value. I acknowledge that my narrative will very likely have negative commercial value (it would take more work to sell it than it would be purchased for), or I would be selling narratives and they would be too valuable to me to offer to you.

The thing is, I wouldn't offer anything based on its cash value, because I value your soul only slightly more than you do. My hope was to find something that you would prefer to btc as the price of your soul. A narrative set to music might be particularly appropriate, since it would allow you to say that you sold you soul for a song.