You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

army1987 comments on Open Thread, June 2-15, 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: TimS 02 June 2013 02:22AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (433)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 09 June 2013 08:09:36PM *  4 points [-]

Considering that in Western society, the man is traditionally the pursuer and the woman the pursued

A more accurate way of putting that is that the man is the first to break plausible deniability. If you also take into account non-verbal, indirect signals (where if the recipient isn't interested they can just pretend to not notice and nothing bad happens), most of the times the very first move is the woman's, both according to this report about Britain and in my experience in both Italy and Ireland: I can't say I can recall ever getting a positive reaction from approaching a woman who wasn't already smiling at me. Now, a guy who has good social skills but poor introspection may only approach women who are smiling at them but not be consciously aware that he's preselecting women that way; likewise, a socially savvy but not introspectively savvy woman may not be consciously aware that she's smiling at the guy she likes; as a result, it feels to them like it's the man who's initiating the interaction, which I guess is the main cause of that confusion.

Comment author: gothgirl420666 11 June 2013 02:28:44PM *  0 points [-]

Interesting. Although "if she's smiling at you, she likes you" seems like it wouldn't hold true when you're trying to flirt with acquaintances.

Comment author: [deleted] 12 June 2013 07:16:25AM 0 points [-]

With people you already know, the kinds of indirect signals (where if the recipient isn't interested they can just pretend to not notice and nothing bad happens) are different (and not all of them are entirely non-verbal), but otherwise the same kind-of applies.

Comment author: gothgirl420666 12 June 2013 10:36:50PM 1 point [-]

Do you know what these indirect signals are? This seems like useful information.

Comment author: [deleted] 15 June 2013 07:08:15AM *  0 points [-]

I think I know it when I see them (at least some of the time -- there might be more of them that I'm not noticing), but I can't think of a good intensional description of them (and it doesn't seem polite to me to point at extensional examples based on actual people, even in anonymized form).

It probably also depends on what common knowledge exists or does not exist among the two of you, incl. what culture you're in.