You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

drnickbone comments on Why economics is not a morality tale - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 04 June 2013 03:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (55)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: drnickbone 04 June 2013 06:44:21PM 0 points [-]

I get the difference in country perspective, and the difference between a regulated local monopoly (which I believe you have in US) vs a market structure with a regulated distribution network, but a large choice of retail suppliers.

Incidentally, there are 6 large UK suppliers, and multiple smaller ones, so this is far from perfect competition, but also far from a monopoly. According to this report retail margins are about 7 per cent, and the previous margin was only about 3 per cent. Even in a "good year", the big six suppliers are making an average profit of around £100 per year on an average bill of around £1400 per year. So if the retail price dropped to 9 pence per kWh as opposed to 10 pence per kWh, the firms would probably be making a net retail loss.

While the current profit margin probably does encourage entry, I can't see any way that the retail price could drop to 4.5 pence per kWh and still allow a supplier to make a profit. It seems quite possible that a new supplier could start up offering 5 pence per kWh, and would rapidly grab market share: the fact that no-one in UK is trying that suggests that it just doesn't stack up as NPV positive.