You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

CronoDAS comments on Why economics is not a morality tale - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 04 June 2013 03:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (55)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: CronoDAS 05 June 2013 03:01:43AM *  2 points [-]

That definition, if minimized, leads to economic waste, because it fails to reflect opportunity costs.

Sorry. In the context of microeconomics, "cost" usually means "opportunity cost" and I didn't realize I needed to say this explicitly. Dollar costs are usually a pretty good proxy for opportunity costs in many cases, though...

Comment author: OrphanWilde 05 June 2013 11:55:05AM 0 points [-]

If cost includes opportunity cost, your entire second paragraph ceases to be meaningful, because the cost would necessarily include the opportunity cost of not having priced the good higher and made higher profits. Using opportunity cost as your cost means this kind of underproduction is impossible; your marginal cost is whatever cost would result in the maximum profits.