You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Luke_A_Somers comments on Why economics is not a morality tale - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 04 June 2013 03:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (55)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 05 June 2013 09:16:44PM 0 points [-]

I don't get your better example. People only rarely invoke economic morality tale arguments to reach 'pollution is bad'. I've seen public health arguments (pollution kills and causes disease in humans and poisons our food sources). I've seen direct morality arguments (the above plus killing and causing disease in animals and plants). I've seen economic impact arguments (Public health argument put in monetary terms).

I haven't seen an argument that skipped the public health argument, hit the economic impact, then looped from there into morality.

Comment author: SilasBarta 06 June 2013 09:32:55PM 0 points [-]

Those are moral arguments.

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 07 June 2013 05:38:38PM 0 points [-]

Exactly. They're not economic arguments at all. It doesn't even touch on economics.