You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Douglas_Reay comments on Why economics is not a morality tale - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 04 June 2013 03:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (55)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Douglas_Reay 13 June 2013 11:52:39AM 0 points [-]

If a company is not paying the true cost of the pollution they produce, then they may well be selling their product cheaper than they otherwise would, and thereby selling more of it.

However the amount they sell isn't the thing causing a problem for society. It is just a symptom. In this case, you can't fix the root problem just by treating the symptom.

The problem is that the profits of the company are not correctly tied to the problems they cause, and they therefore have insufficient incentive to invest in ways of reducing the problems (by, for example, buying a different raw material that is slightly more expensive, but far less polluting).

Other factors causing them to reduce production or increase the price they charge customers won't get them to change their behaviour on which raw material they buy.

Comment author: Douglas_Reay 13 June 2013 11:54:06AM -1 points [-]

(For clarity: yes, I know I'm ignoring that increased production is magnifying the effect of the pollution per item.)