You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Trevor_Blake comments on Exercise isn't necessarily good for people - Less Wrong Discussion

9 Post author: NancyLebovitz 08 June 2013 02:32PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (53)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: [deleted] 08 June 2013 03:53:52PM *  6 points [-]

From your summary health appears to mean 'not sick.' If you can clarify what health is rather than what it is not you might be closer to an answer on whether exercise and health are related. Spoiler: yes.

There's the level of physical activity of most of my ancestors, and there's the level of physical activity of my ancestors since the clerical explosion (1800s-present). The former group has a longer track record of success than the later, and for that reason alone I'm guessing they for sure got it right (with a provisional 'not all bad' grade for the inactivity of today). Regular moderate activity of some kind with bursts of heavy activity leads to physical strength and physical grace more often than not.

Comment author: ThisSpaceAvailable 09 June 2013 05:08:31PM 1 point [-]

Length of track record alone is enough? By that logic, are CDs better than DVDs? We have higher life expectancy now then we did before 1800, so if we're just going by post hoc reasoning, exercise is bad.