= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Dorikka comments on Exercise isn't necessarily good for people - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (53)
You might want to add an indicator to the title that you're not sure whether this is true or not. I think that people might treat the number of upvotes (not huge, but definitely positive) as an indication of the veracity of the claim in the title when I don't think that they were intended as such.
Isn't the double modal somewhat redundant, though? "I think it's possible that it's possible that exercise isn't good".
"isn't necessarily good for people" could expand to "is known to not be good for a certain subset of people" or "is possibly not good for people (or a subset thereof)" The second reading seems intended, not the first.
A reasonable point. There are at least two sorts of leakage-- one is whether I've given sufficiently careful attention to the lecture, and the other is whether the material in the lecture is accurate.