= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
ThisSpaceAvailable comments on Exercise isn't necessarily good for people - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (53)
Isn't "exercise" an incredibly broad category? Saying "exercise isn't necessarily good" is a bit like saying "drugs aren't necessarily good". Obviously, there are going to be combinations of exercise and people that don't lead to good outcomes. Broken leg + running a marathon = bad.
I've been running up against the prototype vs. whole range issue on this, and I'm not sure how I want to handle it.
On the other hand, I think most people would think that 150 minutes of moderate cardio/week is beneficial (not just harmless) for anyone who isn't obviously incapacitated.