You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

buybuydandavis comments on A Keynesian key insight - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 19 June 2013 02:05PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (31)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: buybuydandavis 26 June 2013 06:44:10PM -2 points [-]

Microeconomics says that wages demanded and supplied will adjust to reach full employment.

Next time you meet Mr. Microeconomics, tell him he's an idiot. Fortunately for me, I don't know anyone so stupid.

Everyone is employable! Everyone will be employed! What grown up with an intact brain thinks that?

Comment author: wedrifid 27 June 2013 07:48:43AM *  1 point [-]

Next time you meet Mr. Microeconomics, tell him he's an idiot. Fortunately for me, I don't know anyone so stupid.

Everyone is employable! Everyone will be employed! What grown up with an intact brain thinks that?

I expect "Mr. Microeconomics" to glance behind him at "Mr. Straw-man Microeconomics", to whom I would addressing my gratuitous insult.

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 26 June 2013 10:22:36PM *  1 point [-]

Full employment meaning that everyone that desires to work at the wages that they would be offered to do so, would indeed be working.

Comment author: buybuydandavis 27 June 2013 02:25:56AM 0 points [-]

"Would be offered" in what counterfactual universe?

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 27 June 2013 11:52:37AM 0 points [-]

Without counterfactuals: assume Mr X is willing to do job Y at wage Z, and has as much skills as Mr A. Then if Mr A has job Y at wages above Z, and Mr X is unemployed, we do not have full employment.