You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

drethelin comments on The Classic Literature Workshop - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: Ritalin 16 June 2013 09:54AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (115)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: drethelin 16 June 2013 06:28:05PM 4 points [-]

This, however, is wrong. Great Literature works survive as such because they prove relevant to every new generation. When they don't, they very quickly become forgotten or relegated to "famous back then, known mostly to scholars nowadays". Great Literature works that retain their high status over many hundreds of years usually have done that by having something relevant to say to every generation in those centuries; sometimes there're gaps of obscurity and then rediscovery, but those are the exception, not the rule.

this was true until Public Schooling became a standardized system. Consider how long it took for Latin to go from being mandatory to being something almost completely forgotten.

Comment author: Anatoly_Vorobey 16 June 2013 09:48:58PM 2 points [-]

Depends on the country, but, generally speaking, it went from widespread to rare in one generation, and never was mandatory in the age of compulsory schooling.

Not sure what your point is - teaching of (non-classical) fiction in schools is itself very new, only a little more than a century old, and if you look at the mandatory fiction reading list in 1910s, 1930s, 1970s or 2010s, you'll see a lot of changes. So clearly teaching of literature in school doesn't stop Great Works from being reappraised.