You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ThisSpaceAvailable comments on Is our continued existence evidence that Mutually Assured Destruction worked? - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: jkaufman 18 June 2013 02:40PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (67)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ThisSpaceAvailable 22 June 2013 04:20:31AM 0 points [-]

" but it demonstrably did not prevent circumstances that could lead to a nuclear war." Do you mean "it didn't eliminate all circumstances", or do you mean "there were no circumstances that it prevented"?

Comment author: verbify 24 June 2013 01:25:44PM 1 point [-]

I meant it didn't eliminate all circumstances.

I think you've pointed out a flaw in my argument. The statement "MAD made nuclear war impossible" is demonstrably false - nuclear war could still happen with MAD. The statement "MAD prevented nuclear war" could still be true - nuclear war may have taken place (and probably would have been more likely) in the absence of MAD, and therefore MAD did prevent a nuclear war.