You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

elharo comments on The Mystery At The Heart of Central Banking - Less Wrong Discussion

-4 [deleted] 24 June 2013 07:51PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (56)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: elharo 25 June 2013 11:47:05AM *  5 points [-]

Greg Mankiw is strong evidence by authority for your claims. When a major authority in a field says "We don't know what's going on here, and nobody has really tried to find out," it sets off my atrophied grad student reflexes, and I start thinking "dissertation topic!" However were I still looking for a dissertation topic, the next thing I would do would be to spend a few hours in the library, a few hours with Google, and a few hours talking to folks in my department (not necessarily in that order) to see whether Mankiw was correct or not.

As reliable as Mankiw is, he's still just one economist; and my prior that economists as a group don't simply ignore obvious questions like this one is pretty strong. Show me ten respected economists from a diverse array of schools of economic thought that agree with Mankiw that there really hasn't been a lot of research or thought on this topic, and then I update further.

Comment author: William_Quixote 25 June 2013 12:48:05PM 7 points [-]

In addition to providing Harvard with the services of a professional economist, Mankiw also provides TV shows with a media personality, and political campaigns with consulting. He is good at all 3 jobs, but they do sometimes entail different things. Consequently "Mankiw said X" and "Mankiw said X in an article intended for publication in an academic journal" provide very different levels of evidence.