You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Stabilizer comments on Bad Concepts Repository - Less Wrong Discussion

20 Post author: moridinamael 27 June 2013 03:16AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (204)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Larks 27 June 2013 10:46:36AM 3 points [-]

We like to think about whether we "deserve" what we get, or whether someone else deserves what he/she has. But in reality there is no such mechanism.

So you're saying we like thinking about a moral property, but we're wrong to do so, because this property is not reliably instanciated? Desert theorist do not need to disagree - there's no law of physics that means people necessarily get what they deserve. Rather, we are supposed to be the mechanism - we must regulate our own affairs so as to ensure that people get what they deserve.

Comment author: Leonhart 27 June 2013 03:01:30PM 1 point [-]

Perhaps the bad concept here is actually "karma", which I understand roughly to be the claim that there is a law of physics that means people necessarily get what they deserve.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 27 June 2013 10:52:10PM 1 point [-]

I think around here we can call that the just-world fallacy.