(I think the bits about the term "campaign" weren't there when I replied before, hence the separate reply.)

OK, all noted. How about the following? (Which I hope will both clarify my position and get past debates about potentially tendentious terminology.)

• I have a that LW should have, and actively enforce, strong community norms against would-be intimidatory mass-downvoting that isn't (even in principle) justified by the demerits of the comments being downvoted.
• You (if I've understood you right) this proposal.
• I am not that LW should have or enforce norms against downvoting-gjm-dislikes, or anything of that kind,
• and of course I would not expect you to any such .
• I am also not that LW should have or enforce norms against downvoting comments on the basis of their subject matter (as opposed to their merits given the subject matter)
  • and -- though I failed, at least initially, to make this clear -- I don't think it credible that that alone explains what I've been characterizing as would-be intimidatory downvoting of JoshuaZ's comments.
• And, again, I would not expect you to any such and I understand your reasons for wanting to what you took to be such a on my part.
• Though, as it happens, I dislike many instances of this sort of topic-based downvoting and think it would be a bad thing if there were a concerted effort to prevent LW discussions of sexism, feminism, etc., in connection with HPMOR. I understand that you disagree, and repeat that what I am is not for this sort of topic-based downvoting to be prevented, forbidden, or punished.

[EDITED once shortly after posting, for clarity only.]