You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

loserthree comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 20, chapter 90 - Less Wrong Discussion

9 Post author: palladias 02 July 2013 02:13AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (609)
Tags: fiction hpmor harry_potter fanfiction

Comments (609)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: loserthree 02 July 2013 03:56:13AM 0 points [-]

Harry can ask anyone else what the status of memory charms is in the Hogwarts curriculum.

I would guess that either

  • A) They will be evasive in answering any precocious questions because Quirrell asked them to be evasive about some precocious questions or
  • B) Quirrell wasn't telling Harry that wizards are stupid and keep dangerous things in plain sight. He was telling Harry that he'd "pass it to [him] beneath a disguised cover." in the guise of telling him how to learn more about memory charms.
Comment author: Alsadius 02 July 2013 04:15:04AM 14 points [-]

A) He doesn't need to ask a professor, he can just ask a seventh-year.

Comment author: loserthree 02 July 2013 04:17:01AM 1 point [-]

Good point. I'm sticking to B, Quirrell was telling Harry he'd pass it to him on the downlow. Note that he didn't say that the book would be labeled "Memory Charms," just that it would be filed under M.

Comment author: JTHM 02 July 2013 04:27:18AM *  6 points [-]

Magick Moste Evile? (This is an in-universe book from canon, in case anyone forgot.)

Comment author: hairyfigment 02 July 2013 08:18:50AM 0 points [-]

B was my thought - or at least I'd definitely check if I were Harry. But checking every book in the section seems time-consuming and suspicious. I think we should assume there is in fact a standard book on Memory Charms there. Doesn't mean it contains a single truthful word.

Comment author: ikrase 02 July 2013 08:33:12AM 0 points [-]

Even if truthful, it may not actually say how to cast.

Comment author: Fermatastheorem 02 July 2013 05:33:48PM 2 points [-]

In canon, Hermione casts Obliviate in her 7th year (presumably without consulting a restricted text from the Department of Mysteries), so the widely available book may actually have enough information for an intelligent reader to learn how to cast it.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit