You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

mare-of-night comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 20, chapter 90 - Less Wrong Discussion

9 Post author: palladias 02 July 2013 02:13AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (609)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: mare-of-night 02 July 2013 09:50:51PM 0 points [-]

That sounds like it would give a lot of false-positives for non-muggleborns... (Not arguing with your statement, just noting that it seems like the wizards made a bad choice of what to detect, if there were other options.)

Comment author: thakil 03 July 2013 07:12:13AM 2 points [-]

Indeed it is. In book.. 6(?) it is made clear that children in magical families are essentially exempt because of this rule. It is assumed that parents will enforce the rules on their children. It is another example of prejudice in the magical world (which I believe is deliberate. Rowling explicitly and implicitly suggests repeatedly that the current set up of the magical world is corrupt and prejudical)

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 03 July 2013 11:43:09PM 0 points [-]

It is another example of prejudice in the magical world

This particular rule strikes me as pretty reasonable. It is assumed that magical parents can manage their children's magic.

Comment author: Sheaman3773 25 August 2013 09:28:57PM 0 points [-]

If you don't consider that parents might surreptitiously teach their children spells, then sure, that makes sense.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 27 August 2013 05:04:14AM -1 points [-]

Huh? What's there to be surreptitious about? The whole point is that magical parents are trusted to participate in their children's magical development.

Comment author: Sheaman3773 27 August 2013 07:20:32AM 0 points [-]

The students were not supposed to do magic over the summer, full stop. There's no official exception there. The leniency could be rationalized as "magical parents can stop their children from casting spells if need be, so we don't need to monitor them," but it's not "go ahead and do magic, magical parents are trusted to teach and guide their children's magic."

If the children are casting spells, then they are breaking the law. If the parent is teaching them without the child actually casting the spell, then there's no need for an exemption.

Comment author: Fermatastheorem 02 July 2013 11:33:45PM 2 points [-]

The trace is only placed on muggleborns. The Ministry expects magical parents to supervise the magic use of their own children.