You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on [LINK] Analysis of why excluding hostile people is worth it - Less Wrong Discussion

9 Post author: NancyLebovitz 09 July 2013 04:01PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (43)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 10 July 2013 09:16:14PM 2 points [-]

Yes, I think definitions (and understandings) need to be made more explicit.

People who break eggs for the fun of breaking eggs are usually called something along the lines of sadists and psychopaths.

In the context I would assume an "asshole" is someone who just wants X done and does not care at all about your feelings, opinions, convenience, etc. Example one: a recruit training sergeant. Example two: Steve Jobs.

An alternative definition would be "someone who wants to play power and status games" and that's a different case.

An yet another alternative definition is "someone who's more ambitious/aggressive than me".

Comment author: shminux 10 July 2013 10:15:57PM *  1 point [-]

Right, good classification. From the slides:

  • Does the target feel oppressed, humiliated, de-energized or belittled?

  • Does the asshole target those less powerful?

  • Everyone has a bad day sometimes. For assholes, every day is a bad day

Seems like your second definition, "someone who wants to play power and status games" is the closest.