= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
gwern comments on [LINK] If correlation doesn’t imply causation, then what does? - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (23)
Previously submitted: http://lesswrong.com/lw/9jw/michael_nielsen_explains_judea_pearls_causality/
Should I delete? I have no qualms with deleting.
(It's unfortunate that submitting doesn't include the link in a structured way, which would allow duplicate detection.)
Given that the original submission is a year and half old, its likely that enough people are unfamiliar with it that its worth keeping up. (afaik, resubmission isn't a big enough problem in discussion to enact a delete-all-duplicates policy)