You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

shminux comments on "Stupid" questions thread - Less Wrong Discussion

40 Post author: gothgirl420666 13 July 2013 02:42AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (850)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: shminux 13 July 2013 05:28:12AM *  1 point [-]

To steelman it, what about a bet that believing in a higher power, no matter the flavor, saves your immortal soul from eternal damnation?

Comment author: DanArmak 13 July 2013 03:47:43PM 7 points [-]

That is eerily similar to an Omega who deliberately favours specific decision theories instead of their results.

Comment author: shminux 13 July 2013 04:49:57PM -1 points [-]

Just trying to see what form of the Pascal's wager would avoid the strongest objections.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 13 July 2013 11:10:57AM 0 points [-]

I don't think this is just about the afterlife. Do any religions offer good but implausible advice about how to live?

Comment author: DanArmak 13 July 2013 03:47:11PM 0 points [-]

What do you mean by 'good but implausible'?

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 13 July 2013 05:21:13PM 2 points [-]

I was thinking about the Christian emphasis on forgiveness, but the Orthodox Jewish idea of having a high proportion of one's life affected by religious rules would also count.

Comment author: DanArmak 13 July 2013 07:36:43PM 0 points [-]

Judging something as 'good' depends on your ethical framework. What framework do you have in mind when you ask if any religions offer good advice? After all, every religion offers good advice according to its own ethics.

Going by broadly humanistic, atheistic ethics, what is good about having a high proportion of one's life be affected by religious rules? (Whether the Orthodox Jewish rules, or in general.)

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 14 July 2013 01:53:49AM 0 points [-]

what is good about having a high proportion of one's life be affected by religious rules?

It may be worth something for people to have some low-hanging fruit for feeling as though they're doing the right thing.

Comment author: DanArmak 14 July 2013 09:01:38AM 0 points [-]

That sounds like a small factor compared to what the rules actually tell people to do.

Comment author: TimS 13 July 2013 06:17:50AM -1 points [-]

If the higher power cared, don't you think such power would advertise more effectively? Religious wars seem like pointless suffering if any sufficient spiritual belief saves the soul.

Comment author: DanArmak 13 July 2013 07:34:11PM -1 points [-]

If the higher power cared about your well being, it would just "save" everyone regardless of belief or other attributes. It would also intervene to create heaven on earth and populate the whole universe with happy people.

Remember that the phrase "save your soul" refers to saving it from the eternal torture visited by that higher power.

Comment author: TimS 14 July 2013 09:16:05PM -1 points [-]

I don't think we disagree.