You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ikrase comments on "Stupid" questions thread - Less Wrong Discussion

40 Post author: gothgirl420666 13 July 2013 02:42AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (850)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 13 July 2013 10:48:51AM 0 points [-]

Is there any chance I might be sleep deprived if I wake up before my alarm goes off more than 95% of the time?

I think that's possible if you've woken up at about the same time every morning for a month in a row or longer, but over the past week you've been going to bed a couple hours later than you usually do.

In a different thread, the psychomotor vigilance task was mentioned as a test of sleep deprivation. Try it out.

Comment author: TobyBartels 10 August 2014 04:21:19AM *  0 points [-]

Wikipedia says that this test ‘is not to assess the reaction time, but to see how many times the button is not pressed’. I never missed the button (nor did I ever press it improperly), but it still recommended that I consider medical evaluation. (My time was even worse than RomeoStevens's, so I'm not saying that I did well if the job is to measure reaction time!)

Comment author: RomeoStevens 13 July 2013 11:09:13AM 0 points [-]

Calling bullshit on that test. It says I should seek medical evaluation for testing at an average of 313. In comparison to this: http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime/stats.php

Comment author: Tenoke 13 July 2013 12:46:22PM 1 point [-]

Are you sure it doesn't say 'might be suboptimal' and 'Consider seeking medical evaluation'?

Comment author: RomeoStevens 13 July 2013 01:29:50PM *  2 points [-]

I still consider that wildly over the top. But then again, I have an accurate model of how likely doctors are to kill me.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 13 July 2013 03:26:42PM 1 point [-]

Details?

Comment author: RomeoStevens 13 July 2013 09:04:50PM 2 points [-]

Robin Hanson.

Comment author: [deleted] 13 July 2013 02:07:27PM *  0 points [-]

Do you find it that incredible that somewhere around 10% of Internet users are severely sleep-deprived? :-)

But yeah, probably they used figures based on laboratory equipment and I guess low-end computer mice are slower than that.