You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

aelephant comments on "Stupid" questions thread - Less Wrong Discussion

40 Post author: gothgirl420666 13 July 2013 02:42AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (850)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: aelephant 14 July 2013 01:46:11AM 4 points [-]

It is pretty easy to indicate that you don't want to engage -- just don't engage. If someone asks you a question you don't want to answer, just don't answer. I would rather live in a world where people tried to be social & friendly to one another than one in which people censored themselves in an effort not to offend people.

Comment author: David_Gerard 15 July 2013 07:38:29AM 7 points [-]

In general, if you suggest a course of action to others that includes the word "just", you may be doing it wrong.

Comment author: SaidAchmiz 15 July 2013 04:30:28PM 6 points [-]

Very much this. Here's an excellent essay on the subject of "lullaby words", of which "just" is one. (The author suggests mentally replacing "just" with "have a lot of trouble to" in such formulations.)

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 15 July 2013 06:15:49PM 3 points [-]

Excellent essay. I strongly recommend it.

In addition to "just", it goes after "soon", "very soon", "should", "all", "only", "anything", and "all I gotta do".

Comment author: drethelin 15 July 2013 04:30:45PM 3 points [-]

it's not a question of a "world" where this happens, it's a question of a subset of the world where you're forced by circumstance to be very close to a person for very many hours. That's kind of like saying "I don't want to live in a world where you can't stretch your arms out without being considered rude." Yes that world would suck, but we're talking about a frigging airplane.

Comment author: aelephant 15 July 2013 11:49:22PM *  1 point [-]

I get that, but my point stands that while you're forced to be very close to them, you're not forced to talk to them. You could even make up an excuse for not wanting to talk. For example, "Sorry, I don't want to chat right now, I'm going to try to take a nap" or "Sorry, I don't want to chat right now, I'm going to put my headphones on & listen to some music". This isn't Clockwork Orange where he's forcing your eyelids open.

Comment author: Desrtopa 16 July 2013 12:06:38PM 2 points [-]

Making up excuses in such a situation is widely seen as rude. If you tell them something like "I'm going to try to take a nap," and do not proceed to take a nap, or at least fake one, you're liable to give offense.

In a situation like this, I would very likely be taking the time to think, and telling someone that you want to think instead of talk to them is widely viewed as rude because it privileges your thoughts over their company.