You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

nyan_sandwich comments on An Attempt at Preference Uncertainty Using VNM - Less Wrong Discussion

8 [deleted] 16 July 2013 05:20AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (33)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 16 July 2013 07:53:24PM 1 point [-]

Why would you use a geometric mean? It might make the problem go away, but why does it do that? what was the problem and why is a geometric mean the only solution?

I think it's a really bad strategy to respond to an apparent problem by just pulling ideas out of thin air until you find one who's flaws are non-obvious. It seems much more prudent to try to understand what the problem is and why it occurred, so that we can derive something that actually does the right thing. A problem is an indication that we don't understand what's going on, which should be a halt-and-rethink-everything moment.

Comment author: AlexMennen 16 July 2013 09:48:15PM 1 point [-]

I was just pointing out that it is a possible solution to the problem that Karl mentioned. I agree that it probably isn't a good solution overall. Maybe I shouldn't have brought it up.

Comment author: [deleted] 16 July 2013 10:26:34PM 1 point [-]

The tone of my response was a bit hostile. Sorry about that. It was a general comment against doing things that way, which I've had nothing but trouble from. It was prompted by prompted by your comment, but not really a reply to your idea in particular.