If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.
Here's a very "interesting" take on this community: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ku9b-fPa1s
His "no evidence for Bayes, and therefore trusting Bayes is unskeptical" argument seems weak. Don't all ideas of evidence require philosophical underpinnings?
If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.