You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

David_Gerard comments on Open thread, July 29-August 4, 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: David_Gerard 29 July 2013 10:26PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (381)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Adele_L 30 July 2013 04:29:25AM *  4 points [-]

the stupid questions thread is very full

Might be worth having those more often too; the last one was very popular, and had lots of questions that open threads don't typically attract.

Because Turing machines are deterministic, AIXI cannot make hypotheses involving randomness. To model the fair coin, AIXI would come up with increasingly convoluted Turing machines, attempting to compress a bitstring that approaches Kolmogorov randomness as its length approaches infinity. Meanwhile, AIXI would be punished and rewarded randomly.

Just a naïve thought, but maybe it would come up with MWI fairly quickly because of this. (I can imagine this being a beisutsukai challenge – show a student radioactive decay, and see how long it takes them to come up with MWI.) A probabilistic one is probably better for the other reasons brought up, though.

Comment author: David_Gerard 30 July 2013 12:21:47PM 2 points [-]

the stupid questions thread is very full

Might be worth having those more often too; the last one was very popular, and had lots of questions that open threads don't typically attract.

Someone want to start one day after tomorrow? Run monthly or something? Let's see what happens.