You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

moreati comments on More "Stupid" Questions - Less Wrong Discussion

14 Post author: NancyLebovitz 31 July 2013 09:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (495)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: moreati 31 July 2013 10:17:35PM 2 points [-]

When you read a comment how often are you consciously aware of who wrote it? How often do you read the username before you read the comment?

Comment author: tim 01 August 2013 12:50:08AM 9 points [-]

I am almost always aware if the author is someone with a distinct name that posts a fair amount. Otherwise it doesn't really register.

(its almost impossible for me not to read the username before the comment unless I put real effort into it)

Comment author: Oscar_Cunningham 01 August 2013 12:10:40AM 5 points [-]

I use the anti-kibitzer. (This anonymises LessWrong, with the hope of reducing bias in judging posts. I think there's an option for it in Preferences.) It's great.

Comment author: Kawoomba 01 August 2013 01:12:33PM *  2 points [-]

Ok, who am I? (lol!)

Edit: The anti-kibitzer feature is quite interesting as I just noticed it's an extremely clear example of a situation in which there's a tradeoff between instrumental and epistemic rationality, and when purposefully depriving yourself of relevant information yields the preferred outcome.

Comment author: drethelin 01 August 2013 01:47:20PM 1 point [-]

Preferred for who? I think being able to judge people is useful

Comment author: Kawoomba 01 August 2013 01:53:56PM 0 points [-]

Preferred for who?

Those who enable anti-kibitzer, which has the sole functionality of hiding information.

I think being able to judge people is useful

Yea, and it'd give you trouble knowing their names (if you use anti-kibitzer), that would detract from you being able to judge.

Comment author: [deleted] 01 August 2013 07:06:12PM 3 points [-]

About 90% of the times for comments and about 60% of the times for posts, I think. (And I'm more likely to notice it when it's a regular than when it's a newbie.)

Comment author: maia 31 July 2013 11:07:57PM 3 points [-]

I only notice if the commenter happens to be someone I know in real life or whose posts I have taken particular note of. Every other LW username could be replaced by "Anonymous Internet Person Number 3," and I would barely notice.

Comment author: Username 02 August 2013 05:28:47AM 2 points [-]

I normally don't register the name at all, but if it's a high-status person on LW (gwern, eliezer, lukeprog), it might grab my attention.

Comment author: ESRogs 02 August 2013 05:07:35AM 2 points [-]

When I'm reading a comment written by a name that I've seen enough to associate a personality with, I'm almost always aware of whose comment it is. But, when it's not a name I know well, I'm not consciously aware of having looked at the name and made that determination.

So I think I must always read the name, and if my brain doesn't recognize it, it automatically filters it out.

Comment author: RomeoStevens 01 August 2013 01:24:41AM *  2 points [-]

I check when a comment a surprises me, in either direction.

Comment author: mare-of-night 01 August 2013 10:59:31PM 1 point [-]

On LW, I hardly ever notice the username. (I tend to notice more often on sites where people have avatars, and sites where I know most of the people whose comments I see.) I think I might be skimming the names, because I remember noticing usernames of people who I already knew about, but can't remember actually reading and comprehending usernames I don't recognize, at least not very often.