= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Oscar_Cunningham comments on More "Stupid" Questions - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (495)
I use the anti-kibitzer. (This anonymises LessWrong, with the hope of reducing bias in judging posts. I think there's an option for it in Preferences.) It's great.
Ok, who am I? (lol!)
Edit: The anti-kibitzer feature is quite interesting as I just noticed it's an extremely clear example of a situation in which there's a tradeoff between instrumental and epistemic rationality, and when purposefully depriving yourself of relevant information yields the preferred outcome.
Preferred for who? I think being able to judge people is useful
Those who enable anti-kibitzer, which has the sole functionality of hiding information.
Yea, and it'd give you trouble knowing their names (if you use anti-kibitzer), that would detract from you being able to judge.