You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

FiftyTwo comments on More "Stupid" Questions - Less Wrong Discussion

14 Post author: NancyLebovitz 31 July 2013 09:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (495)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: FiftyTwo 01 August 2013 10:02:51PM 8 points [-]

How do I learn to accurately model other people?

Comment author: Qiaochu_Yuan 02 August 2013 12:22:04AM 10 points [-]

Spend more time around them. Form hypotheses about what they're going to do and test them.

Comment author: mwengler 06 August 2013 06:21:20PM 5 points [-]

Take a sculpting class with live nude models.

Comment author: [deleted] 03 August 2013 06:50:26AM *  3 points [-]

Humans are generally pretty well-equipped to model other people, and you can practice using that equipment. Imagine as vividly as possible what it would be like to be the other person. Be aware of your own past feelings and other mental processes, in such a way that you can access those memories when you notice that the other person might be experiencing something which is (on some axis) familiar to you. Keeping a journal can help with that. It's also useful take some time to think of your own ways to practice this, where 'practice' includes getting and incorporating feedback. As Qiaochu points out you can be empirical. I would add that 'testing hypotheses' includes asking people about their internal state.

If you know anyone who seems to 'get people' especially well, ask them how they do their thing.

Look for existing resources on building empathy skills.

Comment author: [deleted] 06 August 2013 11:03:42PM 3 points [-]

If you know anyone who seems to 'get people' especially well, ask them how they do their thing.

Being good at doing X doesn't entail being good at explaining how to do X. (See also: Moravec's paradox)

Comment author: Lumifer 06 August 2013 06:39:55PM *  3 points [-]

If you mean explicitly/mathematically, you can't learn that, you have to discover that (and likely get a Nobel shortly thereafter).

If you mean intuitively/qualitatively, well, I bet B&N has a shelf of books about that, though they're probably called How To Understand (or Manage) People.

It might also be that you actually mean "How can I forecast how will that girl react to X?". That's a different question altogether :-D