You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

DavidPlumpton comments on The Fermi paradox as evidence against the likelyhood of unfriendly AI - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: chaosmage 01 August 2013 06:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (53)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: DavidPlumpton 01 August 2013 08:43:29PM 1 point [-]

Maybe interstellar travel is really, really hard--no matter what your level of technology.

Maybe 99% of the habitable planets in the galaxy have been sterilized by unfriendly AI and we owe our current existence to the anthropomorphic principle.

Maybe highly rational entities decide large-scale interstellar travel is suboptimal.

Probably a bunch more possibilities here...

Comment author: wedrifid 02 August 2013 02:11:35PM 5 points [-]

Maybe 99% of the habitable planets in the galaxy have been sterilized by unfriendly AI and we owe our current existence to the anthropomorphic principle.

Anthropic.

DEATH owes his existence to the anthropomorphic principle.

Comment author: James_Miller 01 August 2013 11:30:43PM *  2 points [-]

Maybe 99% of the habitable planets in the galaxy have been sterilized by unfriendly AI and we owe our current existence to the anthropomorphic principle.

Wouldn't we see evidence of this?

Comment author: William_Quixote 03 August 2013 05:29:56PM *  2 points [-]

Maybe highly rational entities decide large-scale interstellar travel is suboptimal.

I think this is an under considered explaination. Once you get more than 10 light years away ( and maybe much sooner than that) coordination is hard. You can't send messages back and forth quickly, you can't synchronize views and conclusions quickly etc.

Maybe the Agi or civilization or whatnot thinks of starting a colony, realizes that after it does so there will be 2 civilizations or 2 AIs and decides that the increase in the odds of conflict after going from 1 to 2 don't justify the benefits.

Comment author: chaosmage 01 August 2013 11:31:06PM *  1 point [-]

Or maybe the Planck mass changes over time, as suggested by Chrisof Wetterich recently and only recently reached a level where life or intelligence suddenly became possible everywhere in the galaxy?

That cannot presently be known, although it's fun to speculate. But I think it helps us more if we can eliminate real-seeming possibilities.

Comment author: shminux 01 August 2013 11:52:35PM 2 points [-]

Or maybe the Planck mass changes over time, as suggested by Chrisof Wetterich recently and only recently reached a level where life or intelligence suddenly became possible everywhere in the galaxy?

I don't think this model would help, since it's designed to explain away the Big Bang and is claimed to be compatible with all present observations (and so is equivalent to the standard Lambda-CDM cosmology at the late times).