You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Tetronian comments on Open thread, August 5-11, 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: David_Gerard 05 August 2013 06:50AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (307)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: [deleted] 05 August 2013 01:34:10PM 0 points [-]

If you had a Death Note, what would you do with it?

Comment author: JoshuaZ 05 August 2013 01:44:24PM 28 points [-]

If you had a Death Note, what would you do with it?

See if I could get some very old people or otherwise have terminal illnesses volunteer to have their names written in it. We can use that data to experiment more with the note and figure out how it works. The existence of such an object implies massive things wrong with our current understanding of the universe, so figuring that out might be really helpful.

Comment author: Leonhart 05 August 2013 06:58:32PM 14 points [-]

I believe it canonically can't run out of pages, so I'd think hard about how to leverage infinite free paper into world domination.

Comment author: ChristianKl 05 August 2013 09:14:12PM 10 points [-]

I don't think you can infinitely fast pull out papers of the death note, so I doubt that you can produce more paper per hour than the average paper factory.

Comment author: FiftyTwo 05 August 2013 08:39:05PM 5 points [-]

Burn the paper to fuel a turbine. Congratulations you now have infinite free energy.

Comment author: Leonhart 05 August 2013 10:53:29PM 11 points [-]

Then it turns out that Death Note smoke particles retain the magic qualities of the source. Writing one's name in dust with a fingertip becomes fraught with peril.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 05 August 2013 09:32:12PM 3 points [-]

It may be extremely difficult to remove pages at a fast enough rate for this to be practically useful.

Comment author: Protagoras 05 August 2013 08:56:52PM 1 point [-]

And you've set global warming to continue even beyond the exhaustion of fossil fuels.

Comment author: FiftyTwo 05 August 2013 09:34:17PM 5 points [-]

The paper is white yes? If we can cover reasonably large areas of land with it it would make a pretty good reflector of solar radiation

Comment author: DanielLC 06 August 2013 04:12:39AM 1 point [-]

You have to make sure nobody writes any names on it.

Comment author: Baughn 05 August 2013 06:56:08PM 3 points [-]

That's a really good fanfiction idea. I hope you won't mind if I swipe it.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 05 August 2013 07:46:59PM 5 points [-]

Not at all. Although to some extent I just asked, what would HJPEV do if he got a Death Note?

Comment author: DanielLC 06 August 2013 04:14:20AM *  6 points [-]

Harry wasn't even willing to use hoarcruxes. If you won't kill a dying man to make someone else immortal, then you're not going to do it just to throw science at the wall to see what sticks.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 06 August 2013 04:57:12AM 0 points [-]

True, so this isn't quite what HJPEV would do but more what would he do if he were slighlty less of an absolutist. (Actually has he ever explicitly said in text that he wouldn't do that. I suspect given his attitudes that you are correct, but I'm curious what the textual basis is.)

Comment author: DanielLC 06 August 2013 06:35:21AM *  3 points [-]

"Well obviously I'm not going to popularize a method of immortality that requires killing people! That would defeat the entire point!"

-- Chapter 39: Pretending to be Wise, Pt 1

Comment author: Benito 05 August 2013 08:24:31PM -2 points [-]

Well done. You have just levelled up.

Comment author: Benito 05 August 2013 09:58:45PM *  4 points [-]

Could someone who downvoted this please tell me why? I was praising a useful thought (WWHJPEVD?).

Comment author: Ben_LandauTaylor 05 August 2013 11:09:27PM 8 points [-]

Nonspecific praise clutters up the thread. Next time, just upvote--it conveys the same information.

Comment author: Benito 06 August 2013 07:30:21AM 7 points [-]

Thanks!

Comment author: Baughn 06 August 2013 03:49:10PM 8 points [-]

The above is a terribly ironic reply.

Comment author: ChristianKl 06 August 2013 09:16:35PM 4 points [-]

Why our kind can't cooperate seems relevant. Even nonspecfic praise can create more fuzzy feelings than an upvote.

Comment author: ChristianKl 06 August 2013 11:53:19PM 2 points [-]

I think the fanfiction could be quite good at explaining to people modern cryptography and anonymity.

Comment author: FiftyTwo 10 August 2013 01:59:36PM 1 point [-]

Also could examine concepts of personal identity, e.g. if someone converts and changes their name does the note recognise only the birth name or the new one? What about trans people who change names? You could ahve people tactically altering their self conception to avoid the effects of the note...

Comment author: ChristianKl 06 August 2013 09:08:51PM *  2 points [-]

How do you recruit the volunteers without giving away that you have a death note and some secret service wanting to take it away from you?

Comment author: taelor 06 August 2013 05:08:59AM 2 points [-]

See if I could get some very old people or otherwise have terminal illnesses volunteer to have their names written in it.

Alternately, you could have a codemned criminal slip and break his neck on the way to the lethal injection.

Comment author: Daniel_Burfoot 06 August 2013 03:29:17AM 14 points [-]

If I found something I thought was a Death Note I would spend a long, long time meditating on the question of how and in what way I'd gone insane.

Comment author: ygert 08 August 2013 02:00:09AM *  2 points [-]

Actually, I think most of the measure of people having Death Notes is... in Death Note itself. Thus, if I had a Death Note, I would logically conclude that the most likely explanation is that I myself am a character in Death Note. Not in the original manga, of course, as I read that and I know I wasn't in it, but likely in some spin-off. I could easily see myself as a character in some sort of Death Note video game/simulation.

I am on the fence about the Simulation Argument, but even so, this is exactly the kind of thing which is strong evidence that I am a fictional character in a simulation. Getting a Death Note? That's the kind of thing that only happens in stories!

(OK, it is true that I should keep in mind the possibility that I simply have gone insane. That is also a reasonable explanation. But it is far from the overwhelming certainty that you are implying.)

Comment author: PECOS-9 05 August 2013 10:42:49PM 9 points [-]

After finding a volunteer with a terminal illness, I'd test the limits of it. E.g. "The person will either write a valid proof of P=NP or a valid proof that P!=NP and then die of a heart attack."

Comment author: gwern 06 August 2013 01:47:17AM 20 points [-]

Already tested by Light in the manga, IIRC; the limits of skill top out before things like 'escape from maximum-security prison', so P=NP is well beyond the doable.

Comment author: PECOS-9 06 August 2013 03:28:07PM 1 point [-]

Ah, I've only seen the anime.

I'd also try "The person will die of cause A if X is true, and cause B if X is false" and other ways to try to push the burden of skill onto whatever mysterious universal forces are working instead of the human.

Comment author: Oscar_Cunningham 06 August 2013 09:48:29PM *  7 points [-]

He tries it in the anime too. (I watched that episode yesterday.) He tries things like "draw a picture of L on your cell wall and then die of a heart attack" on some evil prisoner. It doesn't work.

Comment author: Baughn 06 August 2013 03:46:44PM *  0 points [-]

That's clever, and should be tried.

It might even be possible to jam up the system with a sufficiently hard to compute death requirement, though I'm not sure I'd want to try it. The death note is rather valuable.

Comment author: Manfred 05 August 2013 02:36:24PM 8 points [-]

This probably violates a forum rule. Though I will speculate that Light's plan of trying to kill all criminals he sees named probably does way more harm than good even if you ignore the fact that some are innocent.

Comment author: ygert 05 August 2013 02:49:34PM *  18 points [-]

I would refrain from discussing it in a public forum like this one.

Comment author: LucasSloan 07 August 2013 02:10:19AM 3 points [-]

I'm sorry, but you've already communicated information about this sort of thing just by saying that.

Comment author: wedrifid 07 August 2013 02:52:51AM 2 points [-]

I'm sorry, but you've already communicated information about this sort of thing just by saying that.

Note that this in no way contradicts ygert's claim.

Comment author: FiftyTwo 05 August 2013 08:37:41PM 6 points [-]

Assuming for the moment the magic of the death note prevents me researching and reverse engineering it in any way:

I'd research the people who's death is most likely to result in positive outcomes and kill them. Off the top of my head I'd go for current dictators and their immediate underlings. For example right now killing Robert Mugabe and the upper echelons of Zanu PF is probably the best thing that could happen to Zimbabwe (at time of writing he has just 'won' an election and the opposition are already mobilised, so a slight push is all that is really needed to collapse the regime).

Ideally, if I could ensure suitable anonymity protections I would publicly declare my intentions to have them killed in such a way that identifies me as the killer (e.g. send media outlets a statement with the exact time of targets death). Once my threats have be shown to be sufficiently reliable I will start making them conditional, giving myself the ultimate political blackmailing machine (e.g. if the international Red Cross does not have credible evidence within 30 days that all detention camps in North Korea have been closed and prisoners released, every member of the people's congress will die simultaneously). Assuming I can maintain my anonymity in the long run I would be able to do a significant amount of good.

Comment author: ChristianKl 06 August 2013 11:38:24PM 3 points [-]

What do you do if North Korea put's out a press release that they will nuke Seoul as a reprisal if you kill all members of the congress?

Comment author: ThrustVectoring 06 August 2013 01:38:45PM 2 points [-]

Take a big company like, say, goldman-sachs. Buy out of the money put options. Death-note the top three or four layers of management, simultaneously. Use the millions of dollars you have appropriated for whatever.

Comment author: ChristianKl 06 August 2013 09:24:46PM *  3 points [-]

What do you tell the SEC when they asked you why you brought the options for Goldman Sachs?

Comment author: ThrustVectoring 09 August 2013 01:19:57AM 0 points [-]

Tell them the options were bought on the advice of a psychic reading. Or an Ouija board. Given that people know of the Death Note, they would suspect you to be the holder of the Death Note. Without that suspicion, it's just a massive coincidence.

Alternatively, buy the options as part of a hedge, or as part of a variety of out of the money put options, or as part of any other broad investment strategy. If you get hundred-to-one returns, if it's 5% of your portfolio then you still have five-to-one returns, which is plenty.

Comment author: FiftyTwo 06 August 2013 04:38:38PM 2 points [-]

If we're happy to go full evil then killing world leaders is also a good way to disrupt the economy (see the sudden crash when a fake report of Obama being shot was released).

Comment author: ThrustVectoring 06 August 2013 07:40:00PM 8 points [-]

That's likely to cause more collateral damage than merely taking out the leadership of one company. Cost/benefit analysis and whatnot.

Gambling on sporting events is probably another good way to use the Death Note for making money. It's probably far more ethical. Does the Death Note work on horses? If so, then you can bet on longshots while sabotaging the favorites by killing horses.

Comment author: Lumifer 06 August 2013 05:46:17PM 1 point [-]

I'd research the people who's death is most likely to result in positive outcomes and kill them.

LOL. That's a theme that is very well explored in fiction.

Hint: it's not as crystal clear as you think it is.

Comment author: Adele_L 10 August 2013 04:02:16AM 0 points [-]

I agree with your conclusion that it is not crystal clear, but because the ends don't justify the means (for humans), and not by appealing to fictional evidence.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 06 August 2013 03:01:12PM 1 point [-]

Discussing hypothetical violence towards real people is out of bounds on this forum.

I request that the moderators, if they have not done so already, consider the acceptability of this whole thread.

Comment author: [deleted] 06 August 2013 03:23:13PM 4 points [-]

Discussing hypothetical violence towards real people is out of bounds on this forum.

So far only two (or possibly three) of the comments on this thread have done that, unless you count euthanasia of volunteers with terminal illnesses as violence (which sounds very noncentral to me).

Comment author: Bayeslisk 07 August 2013 07:15:41PM 1 point [-]

Explicitly not post on LessWrong what I would do, or even divulge its existence to anyone, naturally.

Comment author: [deleted] 06 August 2013 03:11:39PM *  0 points [-]

[Deliberately pretending not to have read the other replies.]

Either sell it to the highest bidder and give the money in equal parts to MIRI and GiveWell's top recommended charity, or burn it, depending on the instantaneous level of strength of my ethical inhibitions. Most likely the latter.

EDIT: No, the former sounds like an awful idea on further thought. I'd just burn it down.

Comment author: Baughn 06 August 2013 03:44:46PM 2 points [-]

In so doing you are destroying important evidence about the state of the world which would deeply affect MIRI's mission. (Namely: There are alien teenagers and/or other types of dark lords about.)

There's probably no point in trying to create FAI if we're already living in a simulation.

Comment author: [deleted] 06 August 2013 03:54:22PM 0 points [-]

See the part in square brackets at the top of my comment.