You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Tenoke comments on Open thread, August 5-11, 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: David_Gerard 05 August 2013 06:50AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (307)
Tags: open open_thread

Comments (307)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Tenoke 09 August 2013 10:02:35AM -1 points [-]

If you have any more dangerous ideas, please do contact me.

Comment author: Bayeslisk 10 August 2013 05:48:06AM 0 points [-]

Please define "dangerous".

Comment author: Tenoke 10 August 2013 10:08:08AM 0 points [-]

Whichever definition you use or think people might use would suffice. More info

Comment author: Bayeslisk 10 August 2013 03:09:57PM *  0 points [-]

Well, now the next good question would be "why".

EDIT: saw your post. This is not a cognitive hazard in itself, but rather a possible interpretation of how the described situation could play out.

EDIT THE SECOND: Actually, now that I think of it, there's a single novel component distinguishing it from the classic RB: the memory one. So much for leaving lines of retreat!

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit