You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

tut comments on Open thread, August 5-11, 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: David_Gerard 05 August 2013 06:50AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (307)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: EHeller 11 August 2013 01:13:00AM *  0 points [-]

The Schrödinger Equation establishes linearity, thus directly allowing us to split any arbitrary wavefunction however we please.

But many of the more-general lagrangians of particle physics are non-linear, in general there should be higher order, non-linear corrections. So Schrödinger is a single-particle/linearized approximation. What does this do for your view of many worlds? When we try to extend many worlds naively to QFTs we run into all sorts of weird problems (much of the universal wavefunction's amplitude doesn't have well defined particle number,etc). Shouldn't we expect the 'proper' interpretation to generalize nicely to the full QFT framework?

Comment author: tut 11 August 2013 08:16:58AM 1 point [-]

Shouldn't we expect the 'proper' interpretation to generalize nicely to the full QFT framework?

Or rather, the proper interpretation should work in the full QFT framework, and may or may not work for ordinary QM.