You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

linkhyrule5 comments on The Rebuttal Repository - Less Wrong Discussion

11 Post author: peter_hurford 11 August 2013 06:59AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (59)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: linkhyrule5 21 August 2013 10:01:45PM 0 points [-]

Sorry, what is the argument against quantum immortality?

I mean, beyond "it's unfalsifiable."

Comment author: wedrifid 22 August 2013 02:16:43AM *  5 points [-]

Sorry, what is the argument against quantum immortality?

I mean, beyond "it's unfalsifiable."

More to the point, it is a confusion. The thing that is called 'quantum immortality' is not immortality. Acting as if it is immortality (for example, by playing quantum roulettes) is typically an error in translating actual preferences from classical intuitions to account for a physics with quantum mechanics.

Anyone who says "I'm only going to die in (1 - (1/3^^^3)) of the measure therefore I'm immortal" is, to put it mildly, not being practical.

Comment author: linkhyrule5 22 August 2013 03:16:05AM 0 points [-]

Oh, I see. I had thought of that, but I thought there was a physical argument being implied.