You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Qiaochu_Yuan comments on Open thread, August 12-18, 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: David_Gerard 12 August 2013 06:46AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (123)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Qiaochu_Yuan 13 August 2013 04:17:47PM 1 point [-]

Why? I don't feel like I have a good grasp of the space of hypotheses about why other people might want to simulate us, and I see no particular reason to promote hypotheses involving those people being negligent rather than otherwise without much more additional information.

Comment author: niceguyanon 13 August 2013 06:25:49PM 0 points [-]

...and I see no particular reason to promote hypotheses involving those people being negligent rather than otherwise without much more additional information.

It seems that our simulators are at the very least indifferent if not negligent in terms of our values; there have been 100 billion people that have lived before us and some have lived truly cruel and tortured lives. If one is concerned aboutNonperson Predicates in which an AI models a sentient you trillions of times over just to kill you when it is done, wouldn't you also be concerned about simulations that model universes of sentient people that die and suffer?

I suppose we can't do much about it anyway, but it's still an interesting thought that if one has values that reflect either ygert's commets or Nonperson Predicates and they wish to always want to want these values, then the people running our simulation are indifferent to our values.

Interestingly, all this thought has changed my credence ever so slightly towards Nick Bostrom's second of three possibilities regarding the simulation argument, that is:

... (2) The fraction of posthuman civilizations that are interested in running ancestor-simulations is very close to zero;...

In this video Bostrom states ethical concerns as a possible reason why a human-level civilization would not carry out simulations. These are the same kinds of concerns as that of Nonperson Predicates and ygert's comments.

Comment author: somervta 14 August 2013 06:23:08PM 1 point [-]

there have been 100 billion people that have lived before us

If we are, in fact, running in a simulation, there's little reason to think this is true.

Comment author: FeepingCreature 19 August 2013 12:53:21AM 0 points [-]

I think you need to differentiate between "physical" simulations and "VR" simulations. In a physical simulation, the only way of arriving at a universe state is to compute all the states that precede it.