You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Discredited comments on [LINK] Hyperloop officially announced — predictions, anyone? - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: malcolmocean 12 August 2013 09:30PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (32)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Discredited 13 August 2013 09:23:21AM *  12 points [-]

Big tube in the air rests on pylons / support towers. Maybe goes along a highway. Vehicle inside the tube has batteries for running a compressor. It pumps air away from its front to reduce air resistance, pumps below for suspension and behind. High subsonic speed (~700 mi/hr, 1100 km/hr). Accelerated by occasional linear induction motors on the tube, like a maglev train. Vehicle estimated to cost millions, tube estimated to cost billions. Conventional rails cost tens of billions. That's all from the abstract, much more inside.

Comment author: Kawoomba 13 August 2013 09:27:23AM 7 points [-]

(~700 mi/hr, 11000 km/hr)

No.

Comment author: Discredited 13 August 2013 10:59:00AM 6 points [-]

Ha, thanks. Fixed.

Comment author: Thomas 13 August 2013 04:30:37PM -1 points [-]

(~700 mi/hr, 11000 km/hr)

NOT at all!

Comment author: [deleted] 13 August 2013 01:15:28PM 0 points [-]

tube estimated to cost billions. Conventional rails cost tens of billions.

Seriously?

o.O

Comment author: drethelin 13 August 2013 07:54:13PM 6 points [-]

a lot of that cost is in getting property rights for a large amount of land on and around the railroad.