You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on Engaging Intellectual Elites at Less Wrong - Less Wrong Discussion

11 Post author: lukeprog 13 August 2013 05:55PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (136)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 19 August 2013 06:27:30PM 2 points [-]

Intellectual elites ... who get approvingly cited

You're defining intellectual elites basically through social/memetic influence and I'm not sure that's the right approach.

Comment author: Risto_Saarelma 19 August 2013 08:04:26PM 0 points [-]

Defining some sort of intrinsic intellectual quality at an useful level to someone who isn't already expected to know the concept we're trying to define seems a lot harder than looking at memetic influence. Are there other big failure modes than getting dominated by popular populists, and are there obvious problems with the idea of screening off the populists by also measuring the interconnected appreciation in the hopefully true elite cluster?

Thinking about this a bit more, it does seem like it might just get us the cluster of people running the mass media instead of the academia. Then again, the mass media refers to the academia a lot more than the academia refers to the mass media, so perhaps we could still get somewhere by following the flow through the clusters.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 20 August 2013 03:23:05AM -1 points [-]

Depends on your goal. If your goal is to influence the culture, this is a useful definition.

Comment author: Lumifer 20 August 2013 03:45:39AM 3 points [-]

Luke's goal seems to be "Engaging Intellectual Elites at LW". As I mentioned somewhere in the comments, I don't know what Luke's terminal goal is.