You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Metus comments on Open thread, August 26 - September 1, 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: philh 26 August 2013 09:00PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (148)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: So8res 27 August 2013 12:44:55AM *  20 points [-]

A few weeks ago I started assessing my own calibration, using tools such as the CFAR calibration game. I got fairly good and concluded that I am relatively well calibrated.

When given a question, my instincts would immediately throw out a number. I'd unpack it and adjust it in accordance to known biases. (Avoid representativeness, start from base rates, treat the initial number as a degree of support, factor in strength of evidence, etc.)

Yesterday, an assessment of probability came up in conversation. Immediately, my instincts threw out the number "80%". My thoughts went like this:

My gut says 80%. I'm well calibrated, so 80% is probably right.

I opened my mouth to speak.

Then I shut my mouth.

I understand Löb's theorem on an intuitive level now.

Comment author: Metus 27 August 2013 08:47:17PM 1 point [-]

A few weeks ago I started assessing my own calibration, using tools such as the CFAR calibration game. I got fairly good and concluded that I am relatively well calibrated.

TIL this app exists. Thank you.

After using it for half an hour it turns out that I am well calibrated at probabilities except 80% and 90%. Weird.

Anyhow, could this be combined with a program such as Anki? Meaning, that you place the answer in your head and indicate how certain you are in percent. If correct, the card will be placed accordingly into the future. This should work splendidly with learning vocab for linguistically close languages.