= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Omid comments on Yet more "stupid" questions - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (340)
See I don't understand why Christians think the trinity is a contradiction. "God is one person, composed of three other persons." makes as much sense as "The China brain is one person, composed of a billion people" or "a subset is a set that is part of another set". In programming, it's easy to create an object that belongs to class X while also having component parts that belong to class X.
The problem is that the options you just alluded to are probably heresy: I think subordinationism on one side and modalistic monarchianism on the other.
I think the idea is that it's supposed to be both the same being and different beings, and the logical contradiction is a Divine Mystery?
Or something like that.
To me, that just means that God is fractal