You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Warrigal comments on The Up-Goer Five Game: Explaining hard ideas with simple words - Less Wrong Discussion

29 Post author: RobbBB 05 September 2013 05:54AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (82)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 08 September 2013 02:21:17AM 0 points [-]

The question still stands, if someone is "rationally" interested in one's own well-being only, and if someone only cares about other minds to the extent of how they affect your own mind through the natural empathy reflex, then why should they be interested in the well-being of other minds purely for the sake of their well-being? Shouldn't they only be interested in how the suffering of the other minds affects your own mind?

I don't think it's really possible to argue against this idea. If you're only interested in your own well-being, then doing things which do not increase your own well-being will not help you achieve your goal.