Open thread, September 9-15, 2013

Metus

If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.

25% of test subjects show sadistic tendencies.

I'm surprised it's as low as 25%, but they only tested for liking to hurt insects. I suspect that the proportion would be a good bit higher for liking to hurt mammals, and likewise for liking to hurt low-status humans, and possibly for liking to lower the status of high-status humans.

Implications for CEV?

This is why we need nonfeeling robots we can kick around

2niceguyanon13y

Depending on what your cut off point is for sadism that number could be a lot higher. There are also what could be called passive sadist, those that would not actively take a role in sadistic acts but are quite entertained by it. I suspect most people who watch bull fighting would be physically repulsed at the thought of actually stabbing a live animal with a blade, but they sure can watch it. Also, the popularity of videos griefing online gamer lend me to believe many people enjoy this type of mischief.

2wedrifid13y

Calling the last one or two 'sadistic' would be something of a stretch. The impulse to lower the status of another seems rather independent of sadism. That seems to be a straightforward social politics heuristic.