You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

pscheyer comments on Military Rationalities and Irrationalities - Less Wrong Discussion

21 Post author: pscheyer 09 September 2013 11:48PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (58)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: pscheyer 12 September 2013 11:02:19PM 0 points [-]

Agreed, and to expand i would say that the level of capital devoted to a task is how much it actually needs to be done. Cheap, basic supplies are for tasks which are really not important and if they were, they could be done by people other than military personnel more cheaply. A few token mops just shows that you need something to give the E-2s or their morale goes in the shitter. Mission-essential bases have janitorial contractors.

I'm not sure it would be better to use people maximally efficiently once they're hired! That is an interesting question. Personally i would rather have them idle and available to be tasked with important missions that may come up than 'busy' all the time for the sake of busyness, which is how 'use people maximally efficiently because we have them' tend to play out.

Comment author: ThrustVectoring 11 December 2013 07:19:07PM 0 points [-]

Availability for tasks is a valuable task, but it needs subtle thinking to evaluate (option pricing for one).

Comment author: Lumifer 11 December 2013 07:57:40PM 0 points [-]

The difference between efficient and effective is relevant here.

If there are no useful things ("important missions") for people to do, filling their time with busywork might be efficient but is hardly effective.