You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Document comments on College courses versus LessWrong - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: VipulNaik 15 September 2013 12:45AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (55)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Document 16 September 2013 09:24:20AM *  2 points [-]

a lot of three-paragraph posts don't take nearly as much work (and I think don't do nearly as much good) as a few five-page papers.

Most of your post makes sense, but I thought length minimums were widely considered a perverse incentive. If I make a three-paragraph post to a forum, the first draft was probably a lot longer; I wasn't saving myself work by cutting it down.

Comment author: kalium 16 September 2013 08:20:13PM 1 point [-]

They're definitely a perverse incentive in terms of getting quality output, but in terms of writing practice I am not so sure. Certainly each additional paragraph is harder to write than the last, and my intuition tells me that this means that a medium-length paper provides some kind of practice/mental workout that a three-paragraph post does not. Of course it depends on how much fluff and bullshit your particular instructor allows in an essay (not that bullshitting isn't also a useful skill).